Raines Feldman LLP is committed to diversity and inclusion.  Among other initiatives, each month the Firm spotlights an organization that focuses on diversity to encourage everyone to become more involved in organizations that are meaningful to the members of the team.  Matthew Pate, an associate with the Labor & Employment practice, recently spotlighted Equality California.

Logo, company name

Description automatically generated

Equality California

Equality California brings the voices of LGBTQ+ people and allies to institutions of power in California and across the United States, striving to create a world that is healthy, just, and fully equal for all LGBTQ+ people. We advance civil rights and social justice by inspiring, advocating, and mobilizing through an inclusive movement that works tirelessly on behalf of those we serve.  

Equality California works to achieve their goals by advocating for pro-equality legislation, helping to elect pro-equality leaders, advancing LGBTQ+ civil rights through impact litigation and providing services to the LGBTQ+ community across the state of California — including educational programs, leadership training, and efforts to boost civic engagement. In just the past year, Equality California championed bills protecting intersex children, protecting incarcerated transgender people, and providing easier access to the judicial system for transgender individuals desiring to amend their name on government-issued documents. In Washington, DC, they’re working to pass the Equality Act, advance racial justice, and advance women’s rights. 

Why I Support Equality California (Matthew Pate)

Californians probably believe there isn’t much more to do for the LGBTQ+ community in our state, but Equality California demonstrates year-after-year that the progress we’ve made falls short of the equity LGBTQ+ individuals deserve — especially in parts of the state like the Central Valley where there is less support for the community.  While marriage equality and nondiscrimination protections are critical, Equality California consistently shines a light on the oft overlooked struggles of BIPOC members of the LGBTQ+ community, transgender individuals, and disadvantaged youth.  Equality California’s motto is, aptly, “Until the work is done,” recognizing that so many members of the LGBTQ+ community are less concerned about who they can marry than where they will live (homeless youth), how they can find healthcare (trans-affirming care), or even just walk down the street without being a target of murderous harassment (murders of trans women of color). They take an intersectional approach to their work, recognizing that to achieve full, lived equality for all LGBTQ+ people, we must also achieve full, lived equality for women, communities of color, immigrants and people with disabilities.  I support Equality California because their work is just as critical now as ever and we need their brand of bold, effective leadership that advocates for necessary (but at times uncomfortable) change, while building the power of the LGBTQ+ community across California and the nation. 

How to Get Involved

You can get involved with Equality California through volunteering, fundraising, hosting events, and advocacy.  Equality California hosts a number of community events throughout the state, and with California reopening, they are always in need of volunteer support.  If you have particular expertise, Equality California hosts a number of webinars and informational events for LGBTQ+ folks to learn about housing, healthcare, legal advocacy, and numerous other topics.  

Links to Organization

Equality California Home Page: https://eqca.org 

Equality California Donation Page (501(c)(3) and 501(c)(4) options):

(c)(3): https://go.eqca.org/a/donate-equality-california-web?refcode=D20_FR_donate-button-main-web_C3 

(c)(4): https://go.eqca.org/a/donate-equality-california-web?refcode=D20_FR_donate-button-main-web_C4
Equality California Volunteering Page: https://www.eqca.org/take-action/

By John R. Carrigan, Jr. Cozen O’Connor

While early results suggest that both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are safe and highly effective in preventing COVID-19 illness,  employers looking to a vaccine as a way to keep their workforce and customers safe may face an uphill battle. According to a survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control in December 2020 , around 32% of U.S. adults do not intend to take a COVID-19 vaccine. 

Subject to some exceptions, primarily objections based on medical or religious grounds (employees objecting based on a generalized “antivax” stance, or distrust about a certain vaccine, would be on shakier ground), employers generally may implement mandatory vaccination programs. And such vaccination programs have long been common in the healthcare field with respect to illnesses like measles and the flu. 

While a policy requiring employees to take a coronavirus vaccine likely would be enforceable in most cases, it may not be appropriate or advisable for every workplace. Many employers, whether to avoid internal conflict, possible workers’ compensation claims arising out of alleged vaccine side effects, or potential bad publicity, may wish to take a more cautious approach – encouraging vaccination, but not requiring it.  

But even without a hard mandate, employers taking action to drive up their employee vaccination rates face numerous potential legal risks. In hopes of avoiding litigation arising out of a voluntary vaccination program, employers might consider the following strategies:

Ensuring Low or No-Cost Vaccine Access 

The federal government has already contracted to procure millions of vaccinations, and has said that all vaccine doses purchased with U.S. taxpayer money will be available to the American people at no cost. But employers should not assume this means vaccinations will simply be free to all employees.

At least some vaccination providers are expected to charge an administrative fee for the cost of injecting patients, a cost providers may seek to have reimbursed by the patient’s insurance company or, for uninsured patients, by a Provider Relief fund from the federal Health Resources and Services Administration.

To avoid confusion, and potential claims from employees who might end up with an unexpected bill, employers may want to reach out to their health insurance provider to discuss if and how vaccination (and any related administrative costs) will be covered, and whether covered employees will be asked to bear any portion of the cost. Also, given the federal government’s messaging about vaccine availability for “the American people,” employers mindful of potential national origin discrimination claims may also want to seek clarity on vaccination availability and costs for employees who are not US citizens. 

Depending on what they hear from their insurers, employers may elect to cover some or all of their insured employees’ costs associated with vaccination. Employers should also consider anticipated costs related to any employees or key contractors not covered under the employer’s health plan.  

Coordinated Education Campaigns 

Many large employers already run annual campaigns encouraging employees to get flu shots every fall. And many of the strategies proven to be effective with such drives – for instance, multi-channel communications including text messages, email messages and presentations, as well as a visible buy-in from senior management – are also expected to deliver positive results when it comes to a coronavirus vaccine.

By now, many Employers have heard the most common employee objections to vaccination – for instance, a perception that the approval process may have been politicized or rushed, or concerns about an adverse reaction to the vaccine itself – and they should be prepared to address them when the time comes. But employers should try to avoid the appearance of politicizing a public health message. The most successful employee education efforts are likely to frame vaccines as being the best path back to something more like normal life, but without scolding employees who may be wary of taking a vaccine they may see as unproven.

As to those employees who come out in vocal opposition of a vaccine, employers should tread carefully and document any concerns over employee behavior or performance to avoid potential whistleblower and retaliation claims. And, even in non-union environments, employers should recognize their employees’ rights to engage in concerted activities under the National Labor Relations Act, such as circulating petitions objecting to the employer’s vaccination program.    

Understand Timing Thresholds (and Potential Privacy Concerns)

In making any plans for a company-wide vaccination program, employers should recognize that their workforce will likely not all become eligible to be vaccinated at the same time, and that there may be a lag of six months or more between when the first and last employees can get their shots. 

Different states (and, in California, different countries) make their own determinations as to which populations are eligible to receive for vaccination and when. based on factors such as occupation, age or whether the individual suffers from one or more medical conditions associated with increased coronavirus risk. For instance, California has recently announced that, beginning March 15, 2021, health care providers “may use their clinical judgment” to vaccinate California residents aged 16 to 64 with certain health conditions, such as cancer, pregnancy, chronic kidney disease or severe obesity. It is not yet certain just when the vaccine will be available to members of the public who don’t fall into a higher priority group, though government officials have suggested that may not be until the spring or summer of 2021.

Depending on what rollout criteria are in place in a particular jurisdiction, employee privacy rights may come in to play with respect to the timing of an individual’s vaccination. For example, if, in a particular state, the vaccine is made available to individuals who suffer from certain enumerated health conditions three months earlier than the general public, evidence of the date that a particular employee is vaccinated could inadvertently reveal private health status information which would have otherwise been unknown to her employer. In hopes of avoiding invasion of privacy claims, employers might consider various strategies, such as limiting the access to such employees’ vaccination status or asking employees to sign a waiver allowing their vaccination status to be shared with others. 

Offer Stipends or Other Benefits to Vaccinated Employees 

A department-wide pizza party for the group with the highest vaccination rate might not hold quite the same appeal as in years past, but employers may want to get creative with potential incentives to employees who elect to be vaccinated. This might include tangible benefits like gift cards, or other inducements like additional vacation time or flexible hours. For instance, the Los Angeles Fire Department has offered employees gift certificates for ride share services or for stays through Airbnb. While some economists have suggested that the simplest way to encourage vaccinations might be to simply offer cash payments, employers considering this option should consult with counsel to assess the proper treatment of such payments for tax purposes.

Another benefit to consider might be offering employees paid time off specifically to get the vaccine. While some employers have offered employees a few hours of PTO in past years to get a flu vaccine, employers might consider offering more here – early reports suggest that coronavirus vaccines may be more painful to take than a regular flu shot, and may have short-term side effects, such as headaches or flu-like symptoms, that could cause some vaccinated employees to miss work.

Require Vaccination to Work On-Site

Once a vaccine is available, some employers may consider requiring proof of vaccination status for employees who wish to return to the office, while requiring non-vaccinated employees to continue working remotely. While there may be safety benefits to such a strategy, it could open an employer up to failure to accommodate claims from employees who are not being vaccinated for reasons associated with their religion or disability.

On-Site Vaccination Clinics

In past years, some employers may have run on-site mobile flu vaccination clinics in the company parking lot. In theory, this same approach could be effective in encouraging employees to take a coronavirus vaccine. 

But the logistics of such an approach are likely to be more complicated with a coronavirus vaccine, in part because certain vaccines must be stored at very low temperatures which are beyond the capacity of most freezers. Employers considering working with an on-site clinic should reach out well in advance to determine whether this approach might be feasible for their workplace, and before retaining such a clinic, should carefully review any contract language to ensure appropriate controls will be in place and staff have been adequately trained. Employers may also want to determine whether any indemnification provision would insulate them from liability claims based on any improperly administered injection or other errors by the clinic.

Early Engagement with Labor Unions

Any mandatory vaccination policy would likely constitute a required subject of collective bargaining under the National Labor Relations Act, as would other vaccine-related policy changes which would impact employees’ terms and conditions of employment. But, even absent a possible bargaining obligation, management might benefit from early communications with their union counterparts or labor/management committee to assess any concerns and discuss potential joint communications.

Set Aside Administrative Resources in Advance 

 Both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require two separate shots, to be taken several weeks apart from each other. Some people will get the first shot, but forget the second – others may mistakenly take a first shot of one vaccine, and a second shot of another.

To avoid these, and other potentially preventable concerns, employers may want to go ahead and dedicate administrative staff and resources specifically to managing the logistics of a vaccination campaign. The employer might also want to designate a committee to review laws and guidance at the state, federal and local level addressing vaccine issues, and to prepare appropriate notices and revised polices (for instance, revising quarantine protocols to delineate separate rules for employees who have and have not been vaccinated) as needed. 

An earlier version of this article appeared in Law360. 

John R. Carrigan, Jr. is a member in the Labor and Employment Department at Cozen O’Connor. He practices out of the firm’s Santa Monica office.  

With the new year now fully underway, the Century City Bar Association is excitedly looking forward and hoping for a sooner-than-later return to our usual in-person networking events and continuing education series. In the meantime, as most of us continue working entirely remotely and observe distancing protocols, the Century City Bar Association is planning a robust slate of virtual speakers, MCLE offerings, and networking opportunities to engage our membership and keep us connected.

Two weeks ago, Jessica C. McElfresh, Esq., presented on the ins and outs of cannabis law and regulations in her talk entitled Get Up To Speed On the Ethics of Weed

On March 18, 2021, Phillip Maltin, Esq., will speak about his tips for recognizing dishonesty in a number of settings, from mediation to the workplace, in his presentation I Can Read You: How to Identify Liars in the Workplace, and the Legal Action You Can Take Against Them.

On April 15, 2021, Barry Schreiber, Esq. will present Working Tools For Eliminating Cultural Bias. 

Links to register for these, as well as updated information on virtual networking events and other news, can be found within this newsletter, on our website, and on our Facebook and LinkedIn pages. We look forward to seeing you all virtually until we can be in person once again, and invite you to let us know if there is a speaker or topic you would like to see on our calendar of events. Email suggestions, as well as newsletter article proposals or interest in serving on our Board of Governors, should be sent to LWerderitch@ggfirm.com.

Be safe and be well.

Lori Werderitch, President

Lori L. Werderitch